Three Waters co-governance retained after 88,000 public submissions


77
17 shares, 77 points

SmartNews

New mayors uniting against the Government’s Three Waters reforms, assisted death numbers revealed and Melbourne Cup fever begins in the latest New Zealand Herald headlines. Video / NZ Herald

New mayors uniting against the Government’s Three Waters reforms, assisted death numbers revealed and Melbourne Cup fever begins in the latest New Zealand Herald headlines. Video / NZ Herald

The co-governance aspect of Three Waters reform has survived the select committee process, which heard more than 88,000 public submissions on the controversial topic.

The Water Services Entities Bill proposed the establishment of four publicly-owned water entities to deliver “more cost-effective, safe and efficient water services”, taking the responsibility away from local councils.

The legislation dictated the entities would be governed by equal numbers of territorial authority representatives and mana whenua, which had drawn extensive criticism.

In a statement from Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta, co-governance wasn’t mentioned directly, but she confirmed the select committee process had prompted a change to the representation of rural councils.

“We heard from rural councils who felt their voices would be drowned out by larger urban centres,” she said.

“At their request, the Bill now includes a provision which requires a mix of rural, provincial and metropolitan councils to be present on the regional representative group.”

Annual shareholders’ meetings would also be established and would be open to the public, in the “interests of transparency”.

Internal Affairs officials had also worked with the Office of the Auditor-General to improve accountability measures in the legislation, including strengthened reporting lines and obligations, and increased audit scrutiny.

“This level of public reporting will give communities greater visibility of infrastructure investment that supports broader wellbeing.”

Speaking to Newstalk ZB’s Andrew Dickens today, Mahuta said she was confident a solution could be found and criticised those only focused on problems.

“Everybody else is talking about more problems and these problems have been around 20 years,” she said.

“I’m probably the only minister that’s been brave enough to take forward a really difficult issue and come up with a solution, not more problems and this solution ensures that it is not going going to be a burden on ratepayers, who are facing a cost of living challenge right now.”

A report by the Finance and Expenditure Committee, published today, contained objections to the Bill from each of the National, Act and Green parties.

As they have voiced in the past, National and Act have opposed the implementation of co-governance as it pertained to the water entities.

National’s statement included its recognition of the “role of mana whenua as a group … with some interests in specific cultural assets”, but considered co-governance unjustified.

“[T]here has never been a clear justification from the Government for the inclusion of co-governance of public services, which represents a significant departure from existing policy.”

Act Party leader David Seymour has rallied against co-governance in Three Waters. Photo / Mark MitchellAct Party leader David Seymour has rallied against co-governance in Three Waters. Photo / Mark Mitchell

This was echoed in Act’s statement, which claimed Mahuta had not explained the need for co-governance.

“… Mahuta, who is responsible for this bill, is unable to justify why it is necessary for mana whenua to get more of a say than other parts of the community when it comes to the four new water services entities.”

The Green Party was strongly supportive of co-governance, stating water was a “taonga” and that iwi and hapū had long called for stronger water management rights.

However, it did recommend “councils retaining real ownership of water assets and infrastructure”.<...

Advertisements

Like it? Share with your friends!

77
17 shares, 77 points

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
5
hate
confused confused
15
confused
fail fail
10
fail
fun fun
8
fun
geeky geeky
6
geeky
love love
1
love
lol lol
3
lol
omg omg
15
omg
win win
10
win